Comment 9 for bug 397741
Revision history for this message
| Luc Maurer @ Camptocamp (lmaurer-c2c) wrote | #9 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
e3ace39
(Get the code!)
Hello Guys,
I think security is really has for views => If we are able to say noupdate = true for views, we should be able to do it for security because security is link to views to.... it is just a question to be consistent....
security is really simple to change now in the new 5 version => and it is false to think that only default security will be used (link views... too) => people will change it for sure because each company are different => in this case, security is linke translation, it is a parametrisation and not a developpment.
really, fabien, i think is should be improved.
regards
luc