Comment 3 for bug 1013636
Revision history for this message
| Stefan Rijnhart (Opener) (stefan-opener) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Hi Nicolas,
thank you for your reaction. You mention the behaviour of the many2many widget in your answer. However, that widget does actually properly support the required flag. It is where I copied the code from, in the same file.
As this is in my view inconsistent, can you explain in more detail what is the rationale to ignore this attribute on many2one fields?
My business case btw. is a client who does not want any partners without an address in their system.
Cheers,
Stefan.