> if you have several lines (let say 15) in your invoice that are using the same tax rate
totally agree with you on this one - if you have 15 products with the same rate, no point in showing the computations of course. yet this is the thing - my tax rates are different - as you can see in the first post - 0% and 17.5%
> that's the reason why the system is grouping using the tax codes and tax account.
absolutely right - and this is the way it should be - all the tax lines must be grouped by the tax type - please see my server setup on this - PT0 - 0%, PT1 - 17.5%, PT11 - 20% and in the UK we dont need to have different account_account lines for each tax line. i.e. - the localised UK accounting systems's COA is set with just 2 nominal codes - input VAT and output VAT.
As mentioned, I do not see why the invoice object is grouping these tax lines if they have the same nominal codes (account.account.id)
Thanks,
Vadim
p.s. - I dont have a problem with fixing this myself - i just bring something out that doesnt have a good logic and I try to contribute to improve the system, so it will be easily adopted in UK as well by the most sceptical accountants.
Hi Quentin,
> if you have several lines (let say 15) in your invoice that are using the same tax rate
totally agree with you on this one - if you have 15 products with the same rate, no point in showing the computations of course. yet this is the thing - my tax rates are different - as you can see in the first post - 0% and 17.5%
> that's the reason why the system is grouping using the tax codes and tax account.
absolutely right - and this is the way it should be - all the tax lines must be grouped by the tax type - please see my server setup on this - PT0 - 0%, PT1 - 17.5%, PT11 - 20% and in the UK we dont need to have different account_account lines for each tax line. i.e. - the localised UK accounting systems's COA is set with just 2 nominal codes - input VAT and output VAT.
As mentioned, I do not see why the invoice object is grouping these tax lines if they have the same nominal codes (account. account. id)
Thanks,
Vadim
p.s. - I dont have a problem with fixing this myself - i just bring something out that doesnt have a good logic and I try to contribute to improve the system, so it will be easily adopted in UK as well by the most sceptical accountants.