Comment 9 for bug 709575

Quentin

as I said, don't bother for us, we found actual pickings are actually a bit
smaller than that and it doesn't occur every day, so it's usable. At the
same time I'm afraid, we have to deal with more urgent issues like the
Brazilian localization here.
We see folks suggesting OpenERP release policy should match expectations of
banking or other very large companies (I do not as I explained). In any case
this is the kind (not just that one in particular I mean) of issues that
will need to be fixed before trying to target those markets. But I think
their is no rush for that in the current market. In the meantime, please
just assume what OpenERP really is and have a release (fast enough) policy
that would one day make it possible to enter those larger markets. In that
particular case the server perf side can probably be fixed in the same
version, as for the osv mem read API, apparently not, that justify the fast
enough minor release policy IMHO.

Thank you again for your work.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:48 PM, qdp (OpenERP) <email address hidden>wrote:

> hi,
>
> we are currently investigating to find the reason why this part of the
> process is that slow. Thanks for your patience (it seems really
> appropriate this time ^^)
>
> Quentin
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709575
>
> Title:
> [6.0.1][stock] very very slow (22 minutes!!!) to process a large
> picking
>
> Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Hey guys,
>
> <content randomly removed due to foul language, please respect the
> Etiquette!> full description + screenshot here (new bug because different
> concern):
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/709559
>
> During that time, my server CPU usage shows roughly:
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 32290 postgres 20 0 54388 38m 32m R 71 1.2 1:47.89 postgres
> 32284 akretion 20 0 186m 113m 23m S 21 3.5 0:49.00 python
>
> So an SQL log analyzer will help us to find if there is some slow
> query. Fortunately here the case is almost daily, so we will be able
> to log the queries. But if you have an idea, be my guest, cause this
> would impact large companies very badly.
>
> BTW, this is our hardware, the rest of the perf is pretty good:
>
> root@audiolivroserver:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 23
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz
> stepping : 10
> cpu MHz : 1603.000
> cache size : 3072 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 2
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 2
> apicid : 0
> initial apicid : 0
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 13
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov
> pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc
> arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3
> cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
> bogomips : 5852.43
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
> processor : 1
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 23
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz
> stepping : 10
> cpu MHz : 1603.000
> cache size : 3072 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 2
> core id : 1
> cpu cores : 2
> apicid : 1
> initial apicid : 1
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 13
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov
> pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc
> arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3
> cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
> bogomips : 5851.96
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/709575/+subscribe
>