Comment 3 for bug 551543
Revision history for this message
| Grzegorz Grzelak (OpenGLOBE.pl) (grzegorz-og.pl) wrote Re: [Bug 551543] Re: pro-forma invoices: documentation doesn't matchimplementation | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
In PL we understand PRO-FORMA invoice the same way. No number and no
accounting. Then when customer pay the pro-forma invoice we have to issue
normal invoice in (probably) 7 days.
In our local systems pro-forma invoice is usually printed from Sales order.
So it is not related to invoice functionality at all.
But it can have some functional drawback (not formal) in such case. Even if
we issue pro-forma invoice we expect some functionality for checking if this
invoice is paid or not.
When I red docs I remember that it was: pro-forma - no number but WITH
accounting move. So I didn't test it thinking that it would be wrong for PL.
Now you are writing that it is probably good for PL.
GG.