By the way, the test picks arbitrary an partener and address, which turns out to be the company itself.
I suggest it be changed to:
<record id="test_order_1" model="sale.order">
<field name="client_order_ref">test_order_1</field>
<field name="note">This Sale Order was used to test the following use case during the installation: Order - Invoice - Payment - Picking</field>
<field name="shop_id" ref="shop" />
<field model="product.pricelist" name="pricelist_id" search="[]" />
<field name="user_id" ref="base.user_root" />
<field name="partner_id" ref="base.res_partner_agrolait" />
<field name="partner_invoice_id" ref="base.res_partner_address_8" />
<field name="partner_shipping_id" ref="base.res_partner_address_8" />
<field name="partner_order_id" ref="base.res_partner_address_8" />
</record>
Having a distinct delivery and invoice address would be even better but needs patching the base module demo data set in the server.
I'll file another bug for this.
Lionel
By the way, the test picks arbitrary an partener and address, which turns out to be the company itself. order_ref" >test_order_ 1</field> product. pricelist" name="pricelist_id" search="[]" /> user_root" /> res_partner_ agrolait" /> invoice_ id" ref="base. res_partner_ address_ 8" /> shipping_ id" ref="base. res_partner_ address_ 8" /> order_id" ref="base. res_partner_ address_ 8" />
I suggest it be changed to:
<record id="test_order_1" model="sale.order">
<field name="client_
<field name="note">This Sale Order was used to test the following use case during the installation: Order - Invoice - Payment - Picking</field>
<field name="shop_id" ref="shop" />
<field model="
<field name="user_id" ref="base.
<field name="partner_id" ref="base.
<field name="partner_
<field name="partner_
<field name="partner_
</record>
Having a distinct delivery and invoice address would be even better but needs patching the base module demo data set in the server.
I'll file another bug for this.
Lionel