Ok, here is what I did to get it working again...fixing the computation method to include account_move_lines which are not created by the bank statement / transactions (see attached patch)
and adding a view for account.bank.statement
object: account.bank.statement
inherited view: account.bank.statement.form
The domain could be improved though, but at least it works again like expected from 6.1
Now the view for bank statements has the possibility to add account_move_lines from bank journals (take care you only choose move_lines from the proper account)
Hope this will help others and maybe OpenERP to fix this bug/regression quickly
Ok, here is what I did to get it working again...fixing the computation method to include account_move_lines which are not created by the bank statement / transactions (see attached patch)
and adding a view for account. bank.statement bank.statement bank.statement. form
object: account.
inherited view: account.
The domain could be improved though, but at least it works again like expected from 6.1
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xpath expr="/ /page[@ name='statement _line_ids' ]" position="after">
<page string="Journal Entries">
<field colspan="4" name="move_ line_ids" nolabel="1" widget="many2many" domain= "[('journal_ id.type' , '=','bank' ),('statement_ id', '=', False)]">
<tree string="Statement lines">
<field name="date"/>
<field name="period_id"/>
<field name="journal_id"/>
<field name="name"/>
<field name="debit"/>
<field name="credit"/>
</ tree>
</field>
</page>
</xpath>
Now the view for bank statements has the possibility to add account_move_lines from bank journals (take care you only choose move_lines from the proper account)
Hope this will help others and maybe OpenERP to fix this bug/regression quickly