In fact, my test scenario was not the same as the one described by Xavier, and it seems that I was expecting too much of what you are supposed to get when context is passed in a one2many.
So Olivier was right when closing this bug. I found another way to do what I wanted to do without using context is one2many.
In fact, my test scenario was not the same as the one described by Xavier, and it seems that I was expecting too much of what you are supposed to get when context is passed in a one2many.
So Olivier was right when closing this bug. I found another way to do what I wanted to do without using context is one2many.