Comment 47 for bug 1711203

So I've enabled secure boot on my Intel NUC's and have *not* used to workaround in #36, and the machines deployed just fine (that is, they pxe boot off MAAS and they are told to load the shim). The same scenario is when using workaround in #36.

That said, the interesting bit is I remember testing these machines with secure boot enabled when having the non-signed kernel, and they didn't deploy. With the signed kernel, they started deploying.

So, I would like to test and see the difference in other machine other than a NUC.