Today I had an IRC conversation with johnsonm about this RFE:
14:57:36 mlavalle | johnsom: ping
14:57:44 johnsom | o/
14:58:13 mlavalle | hey, any chance this could be discussed next week: | https://bugs.launchpad.net/octavia/+bug/1657091
14:58:14 johnsom | mlavalle What is up?
14:58:15 openstack | Launchpad bug 1657091 in octavia "[RFE]Support l4 udp protocol loadbalance" | [Wishlist,Incomplete] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6)
14:58:45 mlavalle | johnsom: some of my co-workers in China are very interested in this
14:59:37 johnsom | Sure. We are really looking for some solid use cases to bump the priority of | this up. DNS is not a valid UDP load balancer usecase IMHO....
15:00:32 mlavalle | johnsom: ok, I'll put a note to this effect in the bug and let them come up with | a better use case
15:00:52 johnsom | mlavalle There are a couple of options of how to add this, would be interested to | know if there are preferences or protocol inspection requirements
15:01:21 xgerman_ | mostly we will a non-haproxy lb need
15:01:26 johnsom | mlavalle Is there resource available to develop if we come up with a plan?
15:01:57 mlavalle | johnsom: I cannot answer that right now, but I will also make a note about it in | the bug
15:02:06 johnsom | Yeah, there are options to add it to our existing amp plus options to come up | with an alternate amp all together
15:02:23 johnsom | Ok
15:02:47 mlavalle | johnsom: do you want us to bring this up in a specific session next week?
15:04:19 johnsom | mlavalle Yeah, let's add it as a topic here: | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/octavia-ptg-queens (no one had brought it up or | added it yet). I will find a slot on the agenda
15:05:08 mlavalle | johnsom, xgerman_ Thanks guys. See you next week :-)
I also added this topic to the Octavia Denver PTG etherpad
Today I had an IRC conversation with johnsonm about this RFE:
14:57:36 mlavalle | johnsom: ping
| https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/octavia/ +bug/1657091
| [Wishlist, Incomplete] - Assigned to zhaobo (zhaobo6)
| this up. DNS is not a valid UDP load balancer usecase IMHO....
| a better use case
| know if there are preferences or protocol inspection requirements
| the bug
| with an alternate amp all together
| https:/ /etherpad. openstack. org/p/octavia- ptg-queens (no one had brought it up or
| added it yet). I will find a slot on the agenda
14:57:44 johnsom | o/
14:58:13 mlavalle | hey, any chance this could be discussed next week:
14:58:14 johnsom | mlavalle What is up?
14:58:15 openstack | Launchpad bug 1657091 in octavia "[RFE]Support l4 udp protocol loadbalance"
14:58:45 mlavalle | johnsom: some of my co-workers in China are very interested in this
14:59:37 johnsom | Sure. We are really looking for some solid use cases to bump the priority of
15:00:32 mlavalle | johnsom: ok, I'll put a note to this effect in the bug and let them come up with
15:00:52 johnsom | mlavalle There are a couple of options of how to add this, would be interested to
15:01:21 xgerman_ | mostly we will a non-haproxy lb need
15:01:26 johnsom | mlavalle Is there resource available to develop if we come up with a plan?
15:01:57 mlavalle | johnsom: I cannot answer that right now, but I will also make a note about it in
15:02:06 johnsom | Yeah, there are options to add it to our existing amp plus options to come up
15:02:23 johnsom | Ok
15:02:47 mlavalle | johnsom: do you want us to bring this up in a specific session next week?
15:04:19 johnsom | mlavalle Yeah, let's add it as a topic here:
15:05:08 mlavalle | johnsom, xgerman_ Thanks guys. See you next week :-)
I also added this topic to the Octavia Denver PTG etherpad