Purely out of interest for the interesting, Simone, can I tag along, too? I
have a few doubts on the new implementation of the new CLR (Server GC)
background GC and a separate GC thread for each processor plus the work
stealing mode (no pun), which may also come into play in this scenario.
Regards,
Jv
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Simone Busoli
<email address hidden>wrote:
Purely out of interest for the interesting, Simone, can I tag along, too? I
have a few doubts on the new implementation of the new CLR (Server GC)
background GC and a separate GC thread for each processor plus the work
stealing mode (no pun), which may also come into play in this scenario.
Regards,
Jv
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Simone Busoli
<email address hidden>wrote:
> I believe this deserves implementing. /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1057981 anthonysteele. co.uk/async- and-await- with-nunit blogs.msdn. com/b/visualstu dioalm/ archive/ 2012/03/ 13/what- s-new-for- mstest- unit-tests- in-visual- studio- 11-beta. aspx /bugs.launchpad .net/nunitv2/ +bug/1057981/ +subscriptions
>
> Charlie, do you mind if I look into it?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
> Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> C#5 async tests are not supported
>
> Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> If a method is marked async, nunit does not recognise it as a test,
> and some test runners may incorrectly pass it while it is still
> running. These methods actually return a Task not void, and the test
> can only be passed if the task completes without a failure.
>
> As detailed here http://
>
> MSTest supports async tests
>
> http://
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
--
Regards,
Ravichandran Jv ravichandranjv. blogspot. com
http://