Comment 6 for bug 1022810

Revision history for this message
Wayne Brantley (wayne-brantley) wrote : Re: [Bug 1022810] Re: Need ability to turn off combinatorial

Yes....
I used to use testdriven....now I use CodeRush from devexpress has direct
support for unit tests much like testdriven. Also Re-sharper has support
for it....and VS2012 has this kind of support built right in (as you know -
since you built the provider for it)....

- Like I said, even a attribute to turn it off would be helpful...

Thanks!

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Charlie Poole <email address hidden> wrote:

> Ah! That explains it. I assume you're using TestDriven or something
> similar.
>
> The reason this has not been a consideration before is that the NUnit
> Gui allows running individual testcases. I'll try to get some sort of
> fix for the problem into 3.0 then.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022810
>
> Title:
> Need ability to turn off combinatorial
>
> Status in NUnit Test Framework:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> When you have a combinatorial attribute such as the following:
>
> [Test, Combinatorial]
> public void MyTest(
> [Values(1,2,3)] int x,
> [Values("A","B")] string s)
> {
> ...
> }
>
>
> Sometimes there is an issue with a certain set of values and you need to
> debug it. Would be nice to just turn off the combinatorial feature (by not
> having the attribute!), so that this could work for debugging:
>
>
> [Test, TestCase(3,"A")]
> public void MyTest(
> [Values(1,2,3)] int x,
> [Values("A","B")] string s)
> {
> ...
> }
>
>
> As it is now, you have to completely redo the signature (and put it back
> after fixing bug/test) or setup a complex break point, etc....
>
> [Test, TestCase(3,"A")]
> public void MyTest(
> int x,
> string s)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/1022810/+subscriptions
>