Comment 60 for bug 1567540

It looks like I am rather suffering from bug 2817. Sorry for the noise here.

But while being there, I found that the proposed patch from comment 13 is at least incomplete, because it places the block that depends on do_memlock above getconfig(), which is the only place where it can get changed from 1 to 0, so at the new location it will always be 1.

So, if the do_memlock block needs to be moved up, at least the getconfig() line should be moved with it, but I have not checked whether there are other cross-dependencies to all the init_* stuff that happens between those two locations.