Functional regression test for evacuate with a target
In I6ddcaaca37fc5387c2d2e9f51c67ea9e85acb5c5 we forgot to update the
legacy filter properties dictionary so the requested target wasn't
passed to the scheduler when evacuating.
Adding a functional test for verifying the behaviour.
NOTE(sbauza): The issue has been incendentally fixed in Pike by
I434af8e4ad991ac114dd67d66797a562d16bafe2 so the regression test just
verifies that the expected behaviour works.
That specific backport is consequently different from the master change
as the final target is different from the one we expected.
Related-Bug: #1702454
Change-Id: Id9adb10d2ef821c8b61d8f1d5dc9dd66ec7aaac8
(cherry picked from commit e0e2e065a495b4fa9ebdec987c935e3c83118c46)
(cherry picked from commit b575a2645137d0e8f1f622ee45fca89605d2fdb9)
Reviewed: https:/ /review. openstack. org/491000 /git.openstack. org/cgit/ openstack/ nova/commit/ ?id=0b672420bce af5a6e264a9362e eb6e29badd09d8
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: stable/ocata
commit 0b672420bceaf5a 6e264a9362eeb6e 29badd09d8
Author: Sylvain Bauza <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 2 19:28:13 2017 +0200
Functional regression test for evacuate with a target
In I6ddcaaca37fc53 87c2d2e9f51c67e a9e85acb5c5 we forgot to update the
legacy filter properties dictionary so the requested target wasn't
passed to the scheduler when evacuating.
Adding a functional test for verifying the behaviour.
NOTE(sbauza): The issue has been incendentally fixed in Pike by 991ac114dd67d66 797a562d16bafe2 so the regression test just
I434af8e4ad
verifies that the expected behaviour works.
That specific backport is consequently different from the master change
as the final target is different from the one we expected.
Related-Bug: #1702454
Change-Id: Id9adb10d2ef821 c8b61d8f1d5dc9d d66ec7aaac8 a9ebdec987c935e 3c83118c46) 8f1f622ee45fca8 9605d2fdb9)
(cherry picked from commit e0e2e065a495b4f
(cherry picked from commit b575a2645137d0e