Comment 5 for bug 1736946

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Newton is basically end of life at this point (we were actually supposed to do that in October I think).

While this bug was introduced in Newton, I don't think we need to hold newton-eol up for this bug, because this will only fail if your conductor service is not configured for the API database and I assume that was pretty common config until at least Ocata when we started requiring cells v2 and more so in Pike when we started pushing for split MQ for cells v2 deployments (where you have a top-level conductor service that can talk to the API DB and a conductor service per cell with it's own MQ and DB, and was isolated from the top-level MQ and API DB).

So in the interest of newton-eol, I'm not going to hold that up for this.