Comment 2 for bug 1614882
Revision history for this message
| egoust (ustinov16) wrote Re: NUMA node scheduling problem | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
In our case we have specific Virtual Network Function images which require deployment with 1 NUMA node topology. Some of them require sr-iov ports and some not.
As from my point of view, NUMA scheduling could be more advanced and instance without pci device request should be placed on NUMA node with no PCI device attached. As example it could be an extra_spec for flavor to specify that guest NUMA nodes should be bind to host NUMA nodes with no associated with them PCI devices in pci_passthrough