Medium as it's a race condition which will affect any nova-network + libvirt+xen deployments and needs a fix to be scheduled.
This workaround was not deemed suitable by Xen as it doesn't solve the conceptual issue of both Xen + openstack trying to update iptables at the same time. Hopefully the concurrent updating isn't needed, but if it is then it's likely an OpenStack script will be needed and passed to libxl as a parameter to ensure the correct updates are made and OpenStack remains in control of the networking
Confirmed as seen several times in the libvirt+xen CI, e.g. http:// d7013eaae7e632d ff837-028d11a4a 642ead4d20755bd 13d99a1b. r55.cf5. rackcdn. com/31/ 189731/ 1/check/ dsvm-tempest- xen/f59dee5/ logs/xen/ index.html
Medium as it's a race condition which will affect any nova-network + libvirt+xen deployments and needs a fix to be scheduled.
This workaround was not deemed suitable by Xen as it doesn't solve the conceptual issue of both Xen + openstack trying to update iptables at the same time. Hopefully the concurrent updating isn't needed, but if it is then it's likely an OpenStack script will be needed and passed to libxl as a parameter to ensure the correct updates are made and OpenStack remains in control of the networking