Comment 4 for bug 1415835

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Discussion on Tempest coverage:

(2:38:57 PM) mtreinish: mriedem: hmm, there might be a neutron api test that does that, but I doubt a compute test would
(2:39:32 PM) mriedem: mtreinish: neutron api test that boots a server with a port id?
(2:39:41 PM) mriedem: i thought neutron api tests for the most part just tested neutron apis
(2:40:07 PM) mtreinish: mriedem: I did say might :) Most likely there is a scenario test doing that
(2:40:12 PM) mtreinish: let me check quickly
(2:42:39 PM) mtreinish: mriedem: yeah check test_network_basic_ops.py there is a test in there that does what you're looking for
(2:45:17 PM) openstackgerrit: Adolfo Duarte proposed openstack/tempest: Adding api tests for dvr routers https://review.openstack.org/133317
(2:53:10 PM) mriedem: mtreinish: weird....wonder why we didn't explode on oleg's change then...
(2:53:23 PM) mriedem: i'll have to dig into it at some point, or just update review so i don't forget
(2:54:00 PM) mtreinish: mriedem: do you have links? I can take a quick look
(2:54:17 PM) mriedem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1415835
(2:55:40 PM) mriedem: mtreinish: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tempest/tree/tempest/scenario/test_network_basic_ops.py#n103
(2:55:50 PM) mriedem: so the test creates a security group under a given tenant
(2:55:55 PM) mriedem: creates a netework
(2:56:03 PM) mriedem: then boots the server to that network
(2:56:12 PM) mriedem: but doesn't boot the server with a specific port at create time
(2:56:13 PM) mriedem: which is the bug
(2:56:39 PM) mriedem: so the port exists in neutron before the server is created, etc
(2:56:59 PM) mtreinish: mriedem: ah, ok. You can probably add that case somewhere if you want, I wouldn't complain
(2:57:40 PM) mriedem: yeah that's the plan at some point