@Thierry: after looking it over carefully, I think I agree with Nikola's analysis. I don't think the code ends up getting called (at least in the standard workflow) without that check, so I agree we can make this public, and fix it using the standard flow.
@Thierry: after looking it over carefully, I think I agree with Nikola's analysis. I don't think the code ends up getting called (at least in the standard workflow) without that check, so I agree we can make this public, and fix it using the standard flow.