To answer your original question Jake yes that was the code that I thought should be changed to use get.
I don't have any current examples of where this is causing a problem, as the bug that led me to this has a fix that avoids thsi code altogether. However it still feels like an exception waiting to happen
To answer your original question Jake yes that was the code that I thought should be changed to use get.
I don't have any current examples of where this is causing a problem, as the bug that led me to this has a fix that avoids thsi code altogether. However it still feels like an exception waiting to happen