Comment 4 for bug 1163469

@Dan Smith: Sorry for such a late reply. I missed this. And I didn't mention the original version :( . It was with Folsom, I'm sure, but can't recall the exact package versions.

@Brent: Just curious, shouldn't adding dubious security rules be disallowed ? If you still think this usage invalid/trivial, it can be closed, if others agree.

I can test this w/ Grizzly and check if it still persists.

Thanks.