Comment 4 for bug 1074087
Revision history for this message
| Michael Still (mikal) wrote Re: Xen migration driver should use execvp | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
7020100
(Get the code!)
Is this bug still valid? I can't find any calls to subprocess or terrible uses of split() in virt/xenapi for grizzly. There are plenty of calls to utils.execute(), but they seem sane to me.