Comment 0 for bug 1038979

Revision history for this message
Jinwoo "Joseph" Suh (jsuh) wrote : extra_specs with no keyword not ignored

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11460/ refactored extra_spec match code. It introduced a couple of bugs:

- When no keyword is given in extra_specs, it is to be ignored. However, the new code does not ignore and compare the given specs with capability and returns the result.

- For <in> operation, if no required word follows an <in>, it crashes. For example, if "<in> aa <in>" is given as extra_specs, it makes it crash since the code tries to pop a word after the second <in>.