Comment 1 for bug 1708165

Revision history for this message
Andreas Scheuring (andreas-scheuring) wrote :

We clarified in the internal Meeting on 2017-09-28 that this is not a use case. Now it's possible to discuss a solution...

I tend to keep the multiline behavior (we decided to go with it for readability; networking dpm is using the same). We could either add this extra piece of validation into the drivers constructor, or we create a new mulitline config that inherits from the existing multiline but does this extra validation...