Comment 1 for bug 925074

Sorry Robert, missed this in a flood of email.

As a packager, is it your opinion that we should release a new essex-3.1 tarball that includes the proper files? It seems like otherwise we are making life even harder on those packaging.

I'll leave brad to comment on the setup_* files. I believe we were leaving them there as a hint to packagers, but that concerns me as I don't want the files to become stale/incorrect over time. What do you think is the best way to give packagers these type of suggestions on how to package? Thanks.