I can only guess that line was supposed to be:
if not ls_linked: continue
So that the next LB is tried. I don't think anything has changed in this code patch since it was committed.
If you could try that and see it would help as I don't remember seeing this before.
I can only guess that line was supposed to be:
if not ls_linked:
continue
So that the next LB is tried. I don't think anything has changed in this code patch since it was committed.
If you could try that and see it would help as I don't remember seeing this before.