> From my reading of the code I think it does this, see neutron/agent/linux/dhcp.py:_generate_opts_per_subnet(), but I could be wrong.
I don't use ovs environment, but I'll keep that in mind. Thank you.
>Ok, so multiple subnets on the same network, but without a router?
Yes, I hope it's possible without a router.
However, I think this might seem strange in a typical network.
I thought about applying the concept of a subnet pool to the network so that divided subnets can communicate within the subnet pool.
Wouldn't it be clearer since it's a sub-prefix of the subnet pool?
It's just one opinion
> Sorry, I don't know much about that patch, you could maybe ping Terry Wilson (otherwiseguy) on irc to see if he can add anything as I don't see neutron consuming it.
I'm sorry. I confused you..
This is a patch that has registered the ovn routing function as a library.
I haven't seen any use cases yet with patches that have opened up availability.
I'll analyze it a bit more
> From my reading of the code I think it does this, see neutron/ agent/linux/ dhcp.py: _generate_ opts_per_ subnet( ), but I could be wrong.
I don't use ovs environment, but I'll keep that in mind. Thank you.
>Ok, so multiple subnets on the same network, but without a router?
Yes, I hope it's possible without a router.
However, I think this might seem strange in a typical network.
I thought about applying the concept of a subnet pool to the network so that divided subnets can communicate within the subnet pool.
Wouldn't it be clearer since it's a sub-prefix of the subnet pool?
It's just one opinion
> Sorry, I don't know much about that patch, you could maybe ping Terry Wilson (otherwiseguy) on irc to see if he can add anything as I don't see neutron consuming it.
I'm sorry. I confused you..
This is a patch that has registered the ovn routing function as a library.
I haven't seen any use cases yet with patches that have opened up availability.
I'll analyze it a bit more
Thank you