Comment 3 for bug 2029722

Revision history for this message
Arnaud Morin (arnaud-morin) wrote :

Hey Brian,

Here is a schema of what we try to achieve.
The Router Ext is missing the ip rule for 10.20.10 network (what alban patch is providing).

And yes, we are running DVR, which means, all of these routers are collocated with the instance.
However, the network node (for snat / 10.20.0.173 on this schema) is on a different hardware.

We will do some tests without DVR to see how it behave.

One of our concern is: does anyone know/remember why the ip rule is added? Why not adding the gateway in the default route table?