Comment 47 for bug 1953165
Revision history for this message
| Bence Romsics (bence-romsics) wrote | #47 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
Hi Florian and Brian,
> So every qdhcp netns with a dadfailed interface does not have its haproxy started.
I believe this to be true with the code we merged. However what is the consequence of it? As Brian asked: is the ipv4 metadata service not working?
We may not have made the best choice to put that return there, because it ties the fate of the ipv4 metadata service (in that ns) to the fate of the ipv6 LL DAD. But there's no guarantee these are in sync.
Anyway, before making a followup change, I believe we should understand exactly what error remains with the current code.