Comment 2 for bug 1922237
Revision history for this message
| Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer) wrote | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
@LIU: from the data plane enforcement point of view you are absolutely right, we need the pps limit first and based on that we can implement a basic form of minimum pps guarantee on the data plane side. However I would like to keep the data plane enforcement out of scope of this RFE so your pps limit and the scheduling part of the minimum pps can be worked on in parallel.