To answer the inquiry regarding versioning:
```
14:14:36 <njohnston> Yes. Ideal would be for the message to incorporate some kind of versioning like an OVO but I don't think we can depend on the other side evolving to understand that necessarily.
```
I agree it would be interesting. I have been contributing quite a great deal already to Ceilometer as well. Therefore, it would not be hard to design a method for it to handle versioned messages as well. I will add this idea to my backlog.
Thank you all guys for the review, and support on the proposal. The pull request is already open and ready for your reviews.
Thanks for the update @Miguel.
To answer the inquiry regarding versioning:
```
14:14:36 <njohnston> Yes. Ideal would be for the message to incorporate some kind of versioning like an OVO but I don't think we can depend on the other side evolving to understand that necessarily.
```
I agree it would be interesting. I have been contributing quite a great deal already to Ceilometer as well. Therefore, it would not be hard to design a method for it to handle versioned messages as well. I will add this idea to my backlog.
Thank you all guys for the review, and support on the proposal. The pull request is already open and ready for your reviews.