Comment 8 for bug 1886949

Revision history for this message
Rafael Weingartner (rafaelweingartner) wrote :

Thanks for the update @Miguel.

To answer the inquiry regarding versioning:
```
14:14:36 <njohnston> Yes. Ideal would be for the message to incorporate some kind of versioning like an OVO but I don't think we can depend on the other side evolving to understand that necessarily.
```
I agree it would be interesting. I have been contributing quite a great deal already to Ceilometer as well. Therefore, it would not be hard to design a method for it to handle versioned messages as well. I will add this idea to my backlog.

Thank you all guys for the review, and support on the proposal. The pull request is already open and ready for your reviews.