Hi Paweł,
Thank you for your question. Below is my answer:
> what kind of message should be logged?
The log message should follow: http://paste.openstack.org/show/728144/
firewall_group log should contain "port" field, and security_group should contains "vm_port" field. The reason is firewall_group log is working in router port(L3), and security_group log is working in vm_port(L2).
> could you extend that part of bug description "This log came from security_group log, but > log_resource_ids=[u'ebe7a495-027e-4982-bd64-fe269617dd6d'] that include the ID of fwg_log", please?
Each of log message contains a list of log objects that capture itself in log_resource_ids. This log message come from security_group logging, but it contains the ID of firewall_group log resource. Please note that, I only created firewall_group log with ID is 'ebe7a495-027e-4982-bd64-fe269617dd6d', and there is no security_group at this moment.
Hi Paweł,
Thank you for your question. Below is my answer:
> what kind of message should be logged?
The log message should follow: http:// paste.openstack .org/show/ 728144/
firewall_group log should contain "port" field, and security_group should contains "vm_port" field. The reason is firewall_group log is working in router port(L3), and security_group log is working in vm_port(L2).
> could you extend that part of bug description "This log came from security_group log, but > log_resource_ ids=[u' ebe7a495- 027e-4982- bd64-fe269617dd 6d'] that include the ID of fwg_log", please?
Each of log message contains a list of log objects that capture itself in log_resource_ids. This log message come from security_group logging, but it contains the ID of firewall_group log resource. Please note that, I only created firewall_group log with ID is 'ebe7a495- 027e-4982- bd64-fe269617dd 6d', and there is no security_group at this moment.
Thank you,
LongKB