As exposing device_id part has high priority, we may still need the filter function but not like the proposal here. So I suggest that we can leave it alone and focus on device_id part right now. If any requirements want this, just reopen this and change the description based on the real implementation of new device_id API part.
@Hongbin,
As exposing device_id part has high priority, we may still need the filter function but not like the proposal here. So I suggest that we can leave it alone and focus on device_id part right now. If any requirements want this, just reopen this and change the description based on the real implementation of new device_id API part.