@Slawek:
IMO, it's better to support fwaas in LB agent. But I'm not sure if fwaas team has a plan for supporting iptables driver for fwaas. However, at least we can make firewall l2 agent to be more generic by moving 'request_int_br' to driver side. Do you think so?
@Slawek:
IMO, it's better to support fwaas in LB agent. But I'm not sure if fwaas team has a plan for supporting iptables driver for fwaas. However, at least we can make firewall l2 agent to be more generic by moving 'request_int_br' to driver side. Do you think so?