Comment 31 for bug 1583694
Revision history for this message
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #31 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
After last week, I had a chance to talk with Carl about this in more details. He may provide his own perspective on the problem.
I am wondering whether a new resource, let's call it redundant FIP for lack of better words, may come handy here to lock down this construct to the centralized SNAT and help simplify the changes required to the DVR control plane. By nature, A FIP for DVR may move along with the VM, whereas in this case I think we pretty much want the FIP to stay put despite how many VMs use it and how/if they move.