Comment 11 for bug 1531013

Thanks, Darragh.

One of my concerns about passing curr_entries for an interface is that there may hundreds (or thousands) of legitimate entries. I wonder what that could/would do to processing time. It only appears to be the flooding entries that are duplicated (in most cases). Normal 'append' behavior is to overwrite and not duplicate, which makes me think it is not a Neutron problem but rather a bridge utility issue. Given that it seems fairly easy to overwhelm using the for loop in an earlier comment, it may not be unreasonable to think it's a problem in busy environments.