Comment 1 for bug 1499170

Are you 100% certain that bug #1498665 is a duplicate of this one?

From its description, it is not - that bug relates to IPv6 host entries belonging to the instances being written into the lease databases, while this bug is about dnsmasq not listening for DNS queries coming in over IPv6 to the addresses assigned to its own router:dhcp ports (because it explicitly binds its listening AF_INET6 socket to its link-local IPv6 addresses only).

Tore