Comment 2 for bug 1486882
Revision history for this message
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote Re: ml2 port cross backends extension | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
I read the spec and the use case description, and unless I miss something I don't think that extending the port resource with a tunnelling information is a viable solution. Ultimately a tunnel IP is a property of a compute host or a subset of them. Each backend can choose how to expose it to allow the wiring, and for that we don't need to spill implementation details all the way to the API.
Please feel free to elaborate your use case further; until then, this is provisionally rejected.