Comment 14 for bug 1468366
Revision history for this message
| Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) wrote Re: RFE - Logging API for security group and firewall rules | #14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
e3ace39
(Get the code!)
(Copy of my comment in the spec review)
In addition to Armando's suggestion to split the effort into SG and FWaaS, I would like to suggest to break down the goal of this work into two points: (a) to define an API to enable logging for a specific set of rules or similar ones, and (b) to define logging format (if necessary). As far as I read through the proposal, (a) looks a more important thing. Right?
At the begging of the proposed spec, the demand that operators want to enable logging for a specific sg rule(s), sg or project is discussed. However, logging format is discussed in the latter half. To satisfy the demand from operators, there is no need to define a logging format. If they can request to enable logging for a specific set of rules or something, the demand will be satisfied.