Comment 40 for bug 1462154

Revision history for this message
Carl Baldwin (carl-baldwin) wrote :

I suspect we've got the wrong fix for this bug. If I'm currently following correctly, we "fixed" this by SNAT to the router gateway address in the qrouter namespace. Is that a correct understanding?

If so, then this is wrong, IMO. We can't just SNAT to the router gateway address in a bunch of qrouter namespaces all over the network. Shared SNAT has to be centralized unless you can figure out some way to coordinate the use of source ports between all of these independent places where SNAT is applied. I've tried to say this a number of times but the message doesn't seem to be getting across. Am I missing something?