One question about the "global per-tenant maximum number of additional address pairs".
In my opinion, if we have the maximum number of the pairs per port , and we also already have the quota for ports. Then the max number of the tenant is Pair_Max_Per_Port * Port_Num. Seems like we do not need the maximum number for the tenant.
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for your confirm and comments.
One question about the "global per-tenant maximum number of additional address pairs".
In my opinion, if we have the maximum number of the pairs per port , and we also already have the quota for ports. Then the max number of the tenant is Pair_Max_Per_Port * Port_Num. Seems like we do not need the maximum number for the tenant.
What I do in the patch is similar to "extra route" extension. /github. com/openstack/ neutron/ blob/master/ neutron/ db/extraroute_ db.py#L100- 103
https:/
It also did not limit the maximum number of route per tenant.
What do you think about this? Thanks .
Regards,
Liping Mao