Comment 10 for bug 1336207

Hi Salvatore,

Thanks for your confirm and comments.

One question about the "global per-tenant maximum number of additional address pairs".

In my opinion, if we have the maximum number of the pairs per port , and we also already have the quota for ports. Then the max number of the tenant is Pair_Max_Per_Port * Port_Num. Seems like we do not need the maximum number for the tenant.

What I do in the patch is similar to "extra route" extension.

It also did not limit the maximum number of route per tenant.

What do you think about this? Thanks .

Liping Mao