The scope of the potential damage can vary as suggested by Cristoph.
It's not really a DoS, more an issue where security groups could be de-enforced without a user knowing it, since no information would be reflected in ports' statuses.
I agree about the security concern, but since the original bug is open, a security embargo is hardly enforceable now.
The scope of the potential damage can vary as suggested by Cristoph.
It's not really a DoS, more an issue where security groups could be de-enforced without a user knowing it, since no information would be reflected in ports' statuses.
I agree about the security concern, but since the original bug is open, a security embargo is hardly enforceable now.