On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Aaron Rosen <email address hidden> wrote:
> Same with source on source_group_ip. If you have a rule
> direction=ingress, group_id=group1 means you can receive from group1 and
> direction=egress,group_id=group1 means you can send to group1. Having
> source there is confusing as well.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Netstack
> Core Developers, which is subscribed to quantum.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144426
>
> Title:
> The name of the security group rule field "source_ip_prefix" is
> misleading
>
> Status in OpenStack Quantum (virtual network service):
> New
>
> Bug description:
> By the implementation, this is interpreted as source ip prefix for
> ingress rules and destination ip prefix for egress rules.
> This should be renamed to avoid confusions.
>
> Apparently, there was a discussion to rename it to remote_* (cidr or
> ip_prefix?).
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1144426/+subscriptions
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I tend to prefer the term "remote"
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Aaron Rosen <email address hidden> wrote:
> Same with source on source_group_ip. If you have a rule egress, group_id= group1 means you can send to group1. Having /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1144426 /bugs.launchpad .net/quantum/ +bug/1144426/ +subscriptions
> direction=ingress, group_id=group1 means you can receive from group1 and
> direction=
> source there is confusing as well.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Netstack
> Core Developers, which is subscribed to quantum.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> The name of the security group rule field "source_ip_prefix" is
> misleading
>
> Status in OpenStack Quantum (virtual network service):
> New
>
> Bug description:
> By the implementation, this is interpreted as source ip prefix for
> ingress rules and destination ip prefix for egress rules.
> This should be renamed to avoid confusions.
>
> Apparently, there was a discussion to rename it to remote_* (cidr or
> ip_prefix?).
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
-- ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~