Comment 7 for bug 2016427

Revision history for this message
Danilo Egea Gondolfo (danilogondolfo) wrote :

Hi, Joshua

I think it's not necessary, unless you are facing a different bug.

Adding a dummy "routing-policy" entry to your configuration should work around this:

network:
  vrfs:
    vrf20:
      table: 20
      routes:
        - to: 1.2.3.0/24
          via: 1.2.3.4

      routing-policy:
        - from: 123.123.123.123

Can you try and let me know if the segfault goes away?

I prepared a fix for it https://github.com/canonical/netplan/pull/341

Thank you!