The list looks to me like a support case waiting to happen. It might have people think they can add more ipv4 addresses as "gateway", and then they might not get the behavior they expect (should it be multiple gateways at the same metric? only the last applies? etc.)
I wonder if it would work well to deprecate that syntax and instead push for people to write routes: ; provided we make it easier and clearer to write a default route.
The list looks to me like a support case waiting to happen. It might have people think they can add more ipv4 addresses as "gateway", and then they might not get the behavior they expect (should it be multiple gateways at the same metric? only the last applies? etc.)
I wonder if it would work well to deprecate that syntax and instead push for people to write routes: ; provided we make it easier and clearer to write a default route.