Comment 4 for bug 1590483

Of course I do NOT agree. I have added a comment on the upstream bug.
They seem to not have understood where the problem lies. Their example uses TRUNCATE and we all know that using truncate would reset the autoinc. I did not mention truncate. I am not truncating. If autoinc refers to the table as a whole (which holds true), then this is a bug.

Please see my answer there. I really feel there is need to have a coherent behaviour of autoinc when a partition is dropped regardless how many rows are in the table.

Thanks
Rick