OK, just to clarify, if the input string (valid in both cp1250 and latin2) is:
ęóąśłżźćńĘÓĄŚŁŻŹĆŃ
Then output from 'cross-conversion' of cp1250 data using latin2 mapping would output:
ęóšłżćńĘÓĽŁŻĆŃ
And 'cross-conversion' of latin2 using cp1250 mapping would output:
ę󱶳żĽćńĘÓˇ¦ŁŻ¬ĆŃ
So characters decreasing confidence of latin2 would be:
šĽ
And those decreasing confidence of cp1250 would be:
±¶Ľˇ¦¬
While in both cases these characters would increase confidence:
ąśźĄŚŹ
OK, just to clarify, if the input string (valid in both cp1250 and latin2) is:
ęóąśłżźćńĘÓĄŚŁŻŹĆŃ
Then output from 'cross-conversion' of cp1250 data using latin2 mapping would output:
ęóšłżćńĘÓĽŁŻĆŃ
And 'cross-conversion' of latin2 using cp1250 mapping would output:
ę󱶳żĽćńĘÓˇ¦ŁŻ¬ĆŃ
So characters decreasing confidence of latin2 would be:
šĽ
And those decreasing confidence of cp1250 would be:
±¶Ľˇ¦¬
While in both cases these characters would increase confidence:
ąśźĄŚŹ