What if we had a status column that had icons in it to indicate things like:
- track is missing
- track has been analyzed
- other things? failed to parse? track is low quality?
Also, missing tracks don't get remove from the crates/playlists -- they
just aren't shown. If the track is marked not-missing at some point then it
will re-appear where it was. I agree the user might go looking for a track
and be confused that it isn't in the playlist where they left it, so I
think you're right that we should fix that.
RJ
2011/11/18 Daniel Schürmann <email address hidden>
> I had considered to move missing tracks directly to the missing tracks
> list, if you try to load it. But I have thought that it is not a good
> idea to let a song disapear when the user whants to do something with
> it.
>
> We need a good solution especially for crates and playlists. There is no
> reason to partly destroy a playlist only because a track is temporary
> unreachable.
>
> What could be the best behavior?
> * Just leave the missing tracks where it is?
> * Mark the song as missing at original place "grayed out"
> * To let the user decide "Track is missing. Do you wish to move it to
> missing Tracks folder ..."
>
> See also Bug #239883 and Bug #801700
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx
> Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673237
>
> Title:
> Missing songs (e.g. deleted, moved) are not marked missing.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/673237/+subscriptions
>
Daniel -- I agree.
What if we had a status column that had icons in it to indicate things like:
- track is missing
- track has been analyzed
- other things? failed to parse? track is low quality?
Also, missing tracks don't get remove from the crates/playlists -- they
just aren't shown. If the track is marked not-missing at some point then it
will re-appear where it was. I agree the user might go looking for a track
and be confused that it isn't in the playlist where they left it, so I
think you're right that we should fix that.
RJ
2011/11/18 Daniel Schürmann <email address hidden>
> I had considered to move missing tracks directly to the missing tracks /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 673237 /bugs.launchpad .net/mixxx/ +bug/673237/ +subscriptions
> list, if you try to load it. But I have thought that it is not a good
> idea to let a song disapear when the user whants to do something with
> it.
>
> We need a good solution especially for crates and playlists. There is no
> reason to partly destroy a playlist only because a track is temporary
> unreachable.
>
> What could be the best behavior?
> * Just leave the missing tracks where it is?
> * Mark the song as missing at original place "grayed out"
> * To let the user decide "Track is missing. Do you wish to move it to
> missing Tracks folder ..."
>
> See also Bug #239883 and Bug #801700
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx
> Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Missing songs (e.g. deleted, moved) are not marked missing.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>