Just to clarify, do you mean the waveform doesn't look aesthetically
pleasing? Or is it visually corrupted? It should at least be changing color
based on the skin that is loaded. For reference, what version of Intel
graphics do you have (post output of `lspci' ?)
Thanks,
RJ Ryan
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Pegasus <email address hidden> wrote:
> You'll see it in Mixxx's console output on startup if it applies to you.
> It'll say something like "Qt v4.6 or higher detected. Using
> rebootMixxxView() workaround..." Can you find out what Qt version you
> have?
>
> --
> waveform doesn't look good on GNU/Linux OSes with Intel Graphic cards
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606697
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Mixxx.
>
Hi Irwin,
Just to clarify, do you mean the waveform doesn't look aesthetically
pleasing? Or is it visually corrupted? It should at least be changing color
based on the skin that is loaded. For reference, what version of Intel
graphics do you have (post output of `lspci' ?)
Thanks,
RJ Ryan
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Pegasus <email address hidden> wrote:
> You'll see it in Mixxx's console output on startup if it applies to you. /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 606697
> It'll say something like "Qt v4.6 or higher detected. Using
> rebootMixxxView() workaround..." Can you find out what Qt version you
> have?
>
> --
> waveform doesn't look good on GNU/Linux OSes with Intel Graphic cards
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to Mixxx.
>