Mixxx

  1. Bug #1810495
  2. Comment #18

Comment 18 for bug 1810495

Revision history for this message
Daniel Schürmann (daschuer) wrote :

@dvzrv: Ah, got it. The second fail was in line 44 not 23.
Now I have fixed some more places by using ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ,

This allows +-4 integer minimal steps. One minimal steps matches the reported -2.22045e-16,
Please retest.